Why is affective forecasting important

In fact, one of the biggest errors all of us make when scheduling our time is what psychologists call affective forecasting —underestimating just how much our emotional and physical states will affect our future decisions and ability to do the things we want to do. But, you still have a few emails to get through before tomorrow morning. As Psychology Today writes :. A group of smokers was asked to predict how much they would pay for a lit cigarette in the future.

Later, when actually presented with the cigarette, they ended up willing to pay significantly more. As the team at ideas42 writes :. Yet few of us think that way at all. We believe our productivity, motivation , and focus will stay pretty much steady throughout the day. Not to mention all the external things that can cause us to lose energy, become unmotivated, and not want to do what we said we would. Rather than just a single, unchanging self, there are actually three distinct ways we experience life:.

As Vanderkam explains :. She is the one who has to brave the rain and the Friday night traffic. There are all sorts of other names for this action. While behavioral economists might say this is an example of Hyperbolic discounting —our inability to delay gratification, which causes us to choose a smaller reward now over a bigger one down the road.

Whatever you want to call it, we make decisions about our future based on how we want to feel. Or, as Oliver Burkeman writes in The Guardian:. Emotion 20, 30— Cipresso, S. Serino, and D. Villani Cham: Springer. Craske, M. Cognitive biases in anxiety disorders and their effect on cognitive-behavioral treatment. Menninger Clin.

Crawford, M. Reactance, compliance, and anticipated regret. DeWall, C. How often does currently felt emotion predict social behavior and judgment? A meta-analytic test of two theories. Positive and negative affect schedule PANAS : psychometric properties of the online Spanish version in a clinical sample with emotional disorders. BMC Psychiatry Dunn, E.

On emotionally intelligent time travel: individual differences in affective forecasting ability. Faul, F. Methods 39, — Feldman, G. Responses to positive affect: a self-report measure of rumination and dampening.

Fischer, R. Standardization in psychological research. Forgeard, M. Seeing the glass half full: a review of the causes and consequences of optimism. Gibson, B. Optimism, pessimism, and gambling: the downside of optimism. Gilbert, D. Feldman Barrett and P. Forgas Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Immune neglect: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Goodhart, D. Some psychological effects associated with positive and negative thinking about stressful event outcomes.

Was Pollyanna right? Gotlib, I. Cognition and depression: current status and future directions. Hoerger, M. Realistic affective forecasting: the role of personality. Emotional intelligence: a theoretical framework for individual differences in affective forecasting. Emotion 12, — Jahoda, M. The meaning of psychological health. Casework 34, — Kahneman, D. Einhorn , ed. Kroenke, K.

The PHQ validity of a brief depression severity measure. Liang, K. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73, 13— Mathersul, D. Forecasting the future, remembering the past: misrepresentations of daily emotional experience in generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder.

Mellers, B. Decision affect theory: emotional reactions to the outcomes of risky options. Mikus, A. Predicting short term mood developments among depressed patients using adherence and ecological momentary assessment data. Internet Interv. Miron-Shatz, T. Emotion 9, — Nasso, S. Autonomic regulation in response to stress: the influence of anticipatory emotion regulation strategies and trait rumination.

Emotion 19, — Nielsen, L. Affect dynamics, affective forecasting, and aging. Emotion 8, — Notario-Pacheco, B. Pavani, J. Affect and affect regulation strategies reciprocally influence each other in daily life: the case of positive reappraisal, problem-focused coping, appreciation and rumination. Happiness Stud. Persson, L. Mood and positive expectations. Pressman, S.

Positive affect and health: what do we know and where next should we go? Reed, A. The theory behind the age-related positivity effect. Riis, J. Ignorance of hedonic adaptation to hemodialysis: a study using ecological momentary assessment. Ryff, C. Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Psicothema 11, 37— Schwarz, N. Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: informative and directive functions of affective states.

Seligman, M. Learned Optimism. New York, NY: A. Shin, G. Psychometric properties of the item Conner-Davidson resilience scale on toxic chemical-exposed workers in South Korea. Sieff, E. Anticipated versus actual reaction to HTV test results. Simmons, J. A 21 word solution. SSRN Electron. Singh, K. Spitzer, R. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD Staats, S.

Perceptions of self-affect: now and in the future. Israeli psychologist Daniel Kahneman is commonly cited in the field of behavioral economics and decision making research for his work on affective forecasting. However, humans are not always happy about the outcomes of their decision making. Wilson and Gilbert suggested that people tend to accurately predict the valence of their future emotions, as well as the specific emotions that they will feel.

However, people tend to overestimate the impact of future events on their emotions, consisting of both intensity and duration. In order for people to accurately predict how they will feel after an event occurs, they will need to know the acceleration of their initial emotional reaction, the peak level of intensity of their reaction, and the rate of deceleration. This is easier said than done, which is why people tend to make inaccurate predictions on all three components: they overestimate the rate of acceleration and the peak level of intensity, while they underestimate the rate of deceleration.

Of course, emotions are complex and can thus result in more complex patterns than said figure, as reactions are influenced by environmental reminders of the event.

Wilson and Gilbert referred to emotional mispredictions as impact bias. People tend to overestimate the lasting impact that a future event will have on our emotional reactions, including both intensity and duration.

Wilson and Gilbert also considered errors that lead to impact bias, such as the misconstrual problem imagining the wrong event and the isolation effect comparing the predicted event to alternative events, and focusing on how little features they share.

An American psychologist and writer, Gilbert wrote international bestseller Stumbling on Happiness, which has been translated into over 30 languages and was the recipient of the Royal Society Prizes for Science Books. Also an American psychologist and writer, Wilson is known for his research on introspection as a source of self-knowledge, the influence of the unconscious mind on our preferences, and decision making. Beyond his contributions to affective forecasting, Wilson also teaches social psychology at the University of Virginia.

Affective forecasting has been applied to a variety of fields beyond psychology, including law and health care. As it pertains to psychology, affective forecasting is important for decision making.

When considering transportation, for example, those who lack experience with public transportation predict they will feel more negative emotions when using such methods of transportation i. Most people with a law degree will recall their foundational Tort Law class in first year, which deals with the types of disputes that arise when one party causes property loss or injury to another.

As a result, some have suggested developing programs to educate jury members on potentially inaccurate predictions and how to decrease such erroneous forecasts. As a result, a medical debate has emerged: some doctors suggest medical paternalism is necessary to override the consequences of affective forecasting, while others hold that these biases simply require changes in doctor-patient communication patterns. Traditional economists assume that humans are rational decision makers who will act in ways to maximize utility.

To overcome these discrepancies, it was necessary for economists like Daniel Kahneman and Richard Thaler to incorporate differences between affective forecasts and future outcomes into types of utility.

For example, take someone who heads to the grocery store while hungry. In their current state, they will take pleasure in their purchase and expect high utility when the food satisfies their hunger. The actual utility of their grocery store purchase will depend on their experience while consuming the food and its anticipated pleasure.

To investigate the role of affective forecasting in victim blaming, Woodzicka and LaFrance asked female participants to read a written scenario describing a job interview where they were asked questions like: Do you have a boyfriend? Do you think it is important for women to wear bras to work?

As predicted, most respondents predicted they would confront the harasser and that they would most intensely feel anger, followed by fear. While most women accurately predicted which emotions they would feel when asked a sexually inappropriate question, predictions regarding the intensity of said emotions were inaccurate. While women still reported feeling anger and fear, it was fear that was most intensely experienced.

Additionally, few women confronted the interviewer. Failure to understand the influence of affective forecasting and these discrepancies impede effective education on harassment and negatively impact targets of harassment, as they may also blame themselves for their lack of action.

Continued research on emotional and physical reactions to harassment is important for developing programs and procedures to alleviate the stigma associated with being a target of harassment.

People often base travel decisions on predictions: whether they think they will prefer lounging on the beach or exploring a historic site, and which location they think will best serve their interests. Existing literature focuses on the mechanisms by which people make predictions about future travel, such as mentally pre-experiencing a holiday.

Researchers have also considered the roles of emotions in that process, such that tourists will attribute a specific emotion to a specific destination. However, we know that affective forecasting can be erroneous, so what happens in the context of travelling during a pandemic?

They considered the role of episodic future thinking, which is the projection of oneself into the future to pre-experience an event. The researchers purposely sampled from the United States, as it was the country most affected by COVID in terms of deaths and cases during May , the time of data collection.