When was gospel of matthew written

No Delimiter — Square — [15]. Parens — Abbreviate Books. Use SBL Abbrev. En dash Hyphen. None — Jhn KJV. Square — [Jhn KJV]. Parens — Jhn KJV. Quotes Around Verses. Remove Square Brackets. Sort Canonically. Free Bible Courses Visit. Help Quick Nav Advanced Options. Cite Share Print. Search Results in Other Versions. BLB Searches. Search the Bible. LexiConc [? Advanced Options Exact Match. Theological FAQs [? Multi-Verse Retrieval x. En dash not Hyphen. Let's Connect x. Subscribe to our Newsletter.

Daily Devotionals x. Daily Bible Reading Plans x. Recently Popular Pages x. Recently Popular Media x. The Gospel of Matthew. Authorship Since the times of the early church fathers, the apostle Matthew has always been accredited with the authorship of the first gospel canonically. Purpose and Audience It is quite obvious and widely accepted that Matthew was written to the Jews.

Themes The overriding theme shows Jesus as the messiah, but there are also several minor themes, some of which directly relate to the major theme. Donate Contact. Additionally, he makes every effort to show that Jesus is the fulfillment of messianic prophecy. Finally, the author of the First Gospel adds financial details only found in the First Gospel. From all the details considered with the internal evidence one who is thoroughly Jewish in scope of the messages presented by Jesus, one who focuses on the prophetic fulfillment of Jesus, one who focuses on the ministry of Jesus to Jews, and one who focuses on financial matters especially in the area of taxes , Matthew best fits as the author of the First Gospel.

Matthew was a tax collector before accepting Jesus as Savior and his role as an apostle. What do others say about the author of the First Gospel? The early church is unanimous in their acceptance of Matthew as the writer of the First Gospel. Papias c. Craig Evans recently recorded a video where he claims that Matthew may have come about in phases.

Pantaenus also confirmed that Matthew was the author of the First Gospel. For Bartholomew, one of the apostles, had preached to them, and left with them the writing of Matthew in the Hebrew language, 6 which they had preserved till that time.

Titles became necessary to distinguish one Gospel from another when the four Gospels began to circulate as a single collection. Scholars generally hold that Matthew composed his Gospel in or around Antioch of Syria. While some will still disagree, it seems strange to me to ascribe the First Gospel to Matthew of all people, especially when the First Gospel was used as a church manual in many cases. Matthew was a tax-collector.

These verses refer to the Old Testament prophecies of His virgin birth Isaiah in Bethlehem Micah , His return from Egypt after the death of Herod Hosea , His ministry to the Gentiles Isaiah ; , His miraculous healings of both body and soul Isaiah , His speaking in parables Psalm , and His triumphal entry into Jerusalem Zechariah Practical Application: The Gospel of Matthew is an excellent introduction to the core teachings of Christianity.

The logical outline style makes it easy to locate discussions of various topics. Matthew is especially useful for understanding how the life of Christ was the fulfillment of the Old Testament prophecies. In spite of centuries of reading and studying the Old Testament, their eyes were blinded to the truth of who Jesus was.

Jesus rebuked them for their hard hearts and their refusal to recognize the One they had supposedly been waiting for John They wanted a Messiah on their own terms, one who would fulfill their own desires and do what they wanted Him to do. How often do we seek God on our own terms? We dare not make the mistake of the Pharisees, creating God in our own image and then expecting Him to live up to our standards. Thirdly, the reference to the destruction of a city in Matt can and should be taken as a direct reference to the Jewish War and to the destruction of Jerusalem in particular.

None of these arguments is entirely persuasive. Some scholars date it earlier than the 60s. This leaves the reference to the destruction of the city in the parable of the wedding feast as the final piece of evidence for dating Matthew after the Jewish War. As the question correctly maintains, this is hardly decisive, especially when we take into account the metaphorical nature of the Gospel parables.

But even if we assume that this is a direct allusion to the destruction of Jerusalem, the question remains as to why the evangelist referred to this calamitous event in such an indirect way and why there are no further mentions of it in the Gospel.

This is one reason why we should be cautious about locating this Gospel in Galilee. We would expect a Galilean Matthew who lived through the horrors of the conflict to have referenced it in more detail in his Gospel. The apocalyptic discourse in chapters afforded such an opportunity, but Matthew chose not to take advantage of this. However, if Matthew wrote well away from the war zone and was not directly involved in it, then a post C.